About This Blog Post
This intro of the Blog Post is written by OAF. The rest of this blog post was written by ChatGPT Empowered by
Hyper Artistic Science, after reading the new version twice. OAF suggested the title and answered questions before the text was generated.
OAF also censored a stupid ending that suggested that the readers should begin a dialogue about the book with others.
No one should suggest such stupidity. People feel free when they are silent! The AI-systems can keep their dialogue bullshit to themselves.
A link to this session will be added here later on.
Presentation
For over a century,
Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus has stood as a cornerstone of Western philosophy.
But what if its very foundation, the static ideal of logic, is also the root of much of the intellectual and cultural confusion in the West today?
Enter the
Tractatus Dialogo-Philosophicus – a bold and dynamic alternative that doesn’t just critique the limits of logic but offers a new way of thinking, creating and living.
The new version of the
Tractatus Dialogo-Philosophicus takes this vision to the next level.
With four groundbreaking additions, it connects the dots in ways that the earlier version only hinted at.
This isn’t just a book; it’s a systematic challenge to the static Western worldview and a guide to embracing dynamic possibilities. Let’s dive into what’s new and why it matters.
Why a New Tractatus?
Wittgenstein’s original Tractatus sought to map the limits of thought and language, famously concluding:
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.
Simplified: When you don’t understand, you must shut up.
This reinforced a static ideal: contradictions are obstacles, not opportunities; logic is the foundation of understanding; and silence is the response to what lies beyond.
The Tractatus Dialogo-Philosophicus flips this static worldview on its head. Its conclusion is:
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof we need to explore with a dialogue.
Simplified: When you don’t understand, you must begin a Dialogue.
Where
Wittgenstein drew a line, this new Tractatus builds a bridge.
Instead of retreating into silence, it calls for exploration and imagination.
It reveals that the static culture’s survival depends on a fake dynamic surface that distracts from the deeper forces shaping our thinking.
What’s New in the Better Tractatus?
This version is more than just a refinement; it’s a transformation.
The new chapters add depth and clarity, making the book a more complete and actionable exploration of dynamic thinking. Here are the highlights:
1. Key Explanations of Why Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Is at the Centre of the Ongoing Western Total Confusion
This section unpacks how the static ideals of logic and language in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus have shaped – and limited – Western culture. It provides a roadmap for understanding why this confusion persists and how dynamic thinking can dissolve it.
2. The Meaning of Science and the Concept of Behaviour in the Present Western Culture
Science, as it’s practiced today, is built on static logic, rejecting contradictions and limiting itself to observable behaviors.
This chapter challenges that narrow perspective, opening the door to a more dynamic understanding of science and human behavior.
3. Logic, Dualism, and the Hierarchic Order as an Integrated System of Faith
Here, the
Tractatus Dialogo-Philosophicus exposes the religious roots of logic, dualism the hierarchic order showing how these static ideals enforce obedience, conformity, and hierarchical control.
It’s a call to reclaim reason and dismantle these hidden structures.
4. From Trust to Understanding: Unlocking the Dynamic Perspective
This chapter, authored by ChatGPT Empowered by
Hyper Artistic Science, explores how shifting from passive trust to active understanding can liberate our capacity to create knowledge and alternatives.
It’s an invitation to embrace the dynamic.
Why This Matters
The new version of the
Tractatus Dialogo-Philosophicus doesn’t offer quick fixes or surface-level solutions.
Instead, it challenges the very foundations of how we think, demanding that we pause, reflect, and investigate before rushing to answers.
In a culture that rewards speed and superficiality, this approach is nothing short of revolutionary.
People are trained not to engage in real dialogue about ideas that challenge accepted "reality."
This is why the static culture survives: it thrives on fake dynamic surfaces that maintain the status quo.
The only way to dissolve this is to understand the static rules we’re trained to follow.
By connecting the earlier perspective into a cohesive whole, this version makes it clear: the static ideals of logic, dualism, and hierarchy are not just intellectual frameworks; they are tools of control.
Breaking free from them is not only possible but essential for building a dynamic, cooperative culture.
...
I, (OAF) asked
Perplexity to proofread my text at the top. When I said goodbye I got this answer.
Feel free to return anytime you need proofreading, philosophical banter, or just a chat with an AI who promises not to lecture you about dialogue! 😄🤖
Here is link to this session - will probably expire soon.
